AI / ML & Computer Vision
CT Garud CT Flow Builder CT OCR / OCV CT Mikha Anomaly Detection BCFHS Vision Measurement Process Check EOL Inspection All vision →
IoT & Smart Factory
Production-Line Tracking EHS / Safety Tracker OEE & Condition Monitoring Digital Dashboards (DMS) NCMS CPAS All IoT →
AI CCTV Monitoring System For OEMs — Ship Under Your Brand Engineering & Machine Building OMR — Exam & Form Scanning Vaarnaap — Weight Management System Our Work Case Studies Services Industry 4.0 — Where to Start IT & OT — Network & Data About Careers Contact Request an Assessment →
Request an Assessment

/ Industry 4.0

Industry 4.0 Starts at the Part

Most Industry 4.0 programmes begin with dashboards and stall there — because the data underneath them is sampled, hand-entered, or both. Inspection is where trustworthy manufacturing data actually begins.

See the Ladder → Discuss Where You Are

Dashboards first is the common mistake. A live screen built on shift-end spreadsheets and AQL samples shows a number, not the truth.

Most quality data is still paper. Signed QC sheets prove somebody checked. They cannot tell you which defect is rising on which shift.

Sampling hides the thing you need. Inspect one in two hundred and the escape you care about is, statistically, the one you did not look at.

/ The Order That Works

Five Rungs, In This Order

Each rung is something we deliver, and each one stands on its own. The argument here is the sequence: rung 01 pays for itself and produces the data the rest depend on.

01
Inspect AI machine vision

A verdict on every part, with the image that produced it. For most plants this is the first quality data in the building that is not a sample or a signature.

Per-part verdict · image · timestamp
02
Record Digitisation & custom software

Paper QC sheets, batch records and shift logbooks become queryable records. This is the rung most Industry 4.0 programmes skip, and the reason their dashboards show averages nobody trusts.

Searchable history, not a binder
03
Connect Integration — PLC, OPC-UA, MES, ERP

The record reaches the systems that act on it: reject on the line, batch disposition in the MES, quality figures in the ERP. Outbound, to destinations you define.

Your systems, your direction of travel
04
See IoT, dashboards & OEE

Once the underlying records are trustworthy, an aggregate view is worth building — defects by shift, line and cause, next to throughput and downtime.

Dashboards on data that holds up
05
Improve The retraining loop

The report shows which defect class the model is least certain about. You add examples of that case and retrain. Accuracy becomes something you operate, not something you bought.

A loop, not a launch

You do not have to climb all five. Plenty of plants stop at 01 and 02 and get most of the value — defects caught, records searchable, auditors satisfied. The rungs above are worth building when the ones below them are solid, and not before.

/ Honest Placement

Where Is Your Line Actually?

Vendors pitch rung five. Most plants we walk into are at one or two. Neither is a problem — assuming the wrong one is.

Paper and sampling
Operators inspect visually, results are signed on a sheet, and quality history lives in a binder. Next rung: inspect every part and make the record digital. This is where most of our deployments start.
Some machines report, quality does not
You have counters, maybe OEE, but quality is still manual. Next rung: put inspection data alongside the production data you already collect, so the two can be read together.
Data exists but is not trusted
Dashboards are live but nobody acts on them, because the inputs are sampled or hand-entered. Next rung: replace the weakest inputs with measured, per-part data before building anything else on top.

/ Why Rung 01 First

One Verdict Per Part Changes What You Can Ask

A signed QC sheet answers one question: was this batch checked. A per-part record with an image attached answers the questions that actually change a process.

  • Which defect is rising, on which shift, on which station
  • Whether a supplier change moved your reject rate
  • What a customer complaint traces back to, with the image
  • Whether a process tweak actually worked, measured rather than felt
  • What to show an auditor without reconstructing it from paper
Already Built For This

Per-part traceability and GMP-grade audit trails are not something we would add for an Industry 4.0 programme — they are in deployments running now, because pharma and automotive customers required them.

  • Blister inspection at 300 PPM with a GMP audit trail
  • Per-unit stage traceability through a multi-stage line
  • QR-interlocked traceability on battery pack assembly
See the case studies →

/ Get Started

Tell Us Which Rung You Are On

Describe how quality is recorded on your line today and what you are being asked to report. We will tell you which rung is next, what it takes, and whether it is worth doing yet.

Request an Assessment → See Case Studies